Idea Perkahwinan: Malam Berinai

Salam Semua.

Memandangkan ada pertanyaan bagaimana persediaan perkahwinan yang aku terima, jadi aku akan berkongsi serba sedikit la idea-idea perkahwinan & bagaimana persediaan perkahwinan aku...

Entry kali ni aku nak share sikit tentang

Malam Berinai!

okay! First of all, sebenarnya... budget untuk malam berinai biasa-biasa je.. tak memerlukan kita berbelanja besar untuk majlis ini yek kengkawan..lagi satu ianya hanya melibatkan pihak pengantin perempuan saje.. kita hanya perlu disediakan lebih kurang:

• bunga telur *untuk letak di pelamin - diberi pada orang yang merenjis
• pakcik2/makcik2 marhaban *untuk menambahkan keberkatan majlis
• siap2 kan makanan sikit.. makan malam biasanya disediakan untuk tetamu ~ tu je la kott~

Pelamin Mini / Pelamin Nikah 

• aku buat pelamin mini/ orang panggil pelamin nikah di rumah bertemakan pinky pinky purple *warna fav aku!
• untuk pelamin mini ni aku pilih design yang simple...since dekat dewan dah ada pelamin
• Pelamin by Ayu Wedding Planner a.k.a Pelamin Buaian Ipoh
  (Sewa: RM 350.00) *if xsilap*
  

Persalinan Pakaian Pengantin Perempuan

• aku pilih sepersalinan baju yang designnya simple/ polos ala-ala baju kurung moden 
• Baju by Ayu Wedding Planner a.k.a Pelamin Buaian Ipoh
  (Sewa: RM 250.00)
• Crown by Ayu Wedding Planner a.k.a Pelamin Buaian Ipoh
  (Sewa: RM 30.00)
• Tudung Plain Merah beli sendiri je! kat mana-mana kedai tudung ada jual
  (Beli: RM 15.00) *kalau naseb baik meby boleh dapat RM 10.00 jek kot! 
• Bunga Tangan beli sendiri di Bunga-Bunga Cinta, Tambun *banyak jugak pilihan bunga tangan yang lawa-lawa kat situ (rambang mata nak pilih n sgt affordable)
  (Beli: RM 48.00)
  

abaikan cara pemakaian veil aku.. sepatutnya tidak lah mcm ni.. aku main taram je since untuk malam berinai xde mak andam nak siapkan.. so ini la hasilnya!!haha

Sekian.. tinta bernohtah!

Idea Perkahwinan: Wedding Guestbook

Salam semua.

Musim perkahwinan kunjung tiba... banyak la jugak aku dapat invitation dari sahabat-sahabat n sedara-mara... maaf la kekadang mak buyong ni xdapat nak attend... mak buyong tengah duk uwek! uwek! xtentu masa... terima kasih atas jemputan korang.

 

Memandangkan ada pertanyaan bagaimana persediaan perkahwinan yang aku terima, jadi aku akan berkongsi sedikit la idea-idea & bagaimana persediaan perkahwinan aku dulu..Macam mana pon semua nye bergantung pada budget perkahwinan yang kita ada...

Entry kali ni aku nak berkongsi macam mana aku buat wedding guesbook

Sekarang ni pon aku tengah buatkan wedding guestbook untuk sorang cik lawyer yang manis yg bakal tukar titlenya bulan depan....

Stage Pertama: Buat Keputusan

Pilih sama ada korang nak buat wedding guestbook sendiri atau nak tempah je. Antara benda yang korang kena take into consideration masa buat pilihan:

• Masa (sempat ke korang nak buat sendiri/ cari barang-barang sendiri)
• Budget (xdinafikan kalau korang buat sendiri, korang akan berjimat.. ye la rata-rata harga guestbook kalau korang tempah dari orang lain sekarang pun dlm lingkungan RM 150- RM 300!!) 
• Tahap kreativiti korang (ni penting untuk korang consider, ye la, bukan apa.. nanti xpasal-pasal korang pening kepala nak siapakan wedding guestbook korang walhal banyak benda lain yang lagi penting untuk difikirkan) 

"Lastly, aku decide nak buat sendiri je"

Stage Kedua: Reka Design

Ni yang paling penting!

Keburukan kalau kita beli brg tanpa reka dulu design..akan buat korang beli je mcm-mcm barang & end up membazir la!!

Bila kita siap-siap reka... korang akan lebih fokus n menjimatkan masa barang apa korang nak cari... so xpayah la tengok2 brg lain.

Dalam mereka design, aku akan ambil kira:

• Warna tema & tema majlis
• Bahan-bahan
• Buku nak tebal/ kecik/ panjang (Saiz la tu)

Stage Ketiga: Start Survey Barang

Tinjau beberapa kedai yang jual barang-barang decor/ kedai decor wedding..atau mungkin tempat korang ada kedai RM 5 ringgit/ MR. DIY (lagi senang kerja korang nnt)

Stage Keempat: Beli Barang

Bila dah survey harga barang & bahan-bahan mana yang cun untuk ditempek kat wedding guestbook tu, then baru la beli!!

"Biar lambat, asal jimat..haha" - Peribahasa buat sendiri!

Stage Kelima: Start Buat

Sila lah peruntukkan masa yang cukup untuk buat wedding guestbook korang... jgn buat last minute plak yer... nnt outcome confirm tettttttttt..

"aku peruntukkan masa dalam 1 minggu nak buat wedding guestbook"

Outcome:

Ni la hasil wedding guestbook aku yang xseberapa sgt! tapi cantik kan!haha *perasan la sgt*

Cover Depan Wedding Guestbook

Wedding Guestbook with Casing

1st Page

Cara aku hias meja guestbook..pagi2 b4 majlis start aku dah kelam-kabut hias meja ni tau.. sampai mak andam tarik aku masuk bilik persalinan untuk make up..hehe *sweet moment

p/s: kalau nak tempah, boleh je.. pm saya! haha *advertisement xberbayar

Filing Borang 6, 7 & 8 (Long Call Procedure) & Long Call Day

LONG CALL PROCEDURE

First kene make sure all the sijils n documents dah complete sebelum pergi filing di Mahkamah Jalan Duta.

Okey step di rumah sediakan:

• Afidavit 6 , Notis Perbicaraan dan Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen & minta tolong kawan kat KL tolong buatkan filing Sijil Penampalan (RM50 sehari je dah boleh extract Sijil Penampalan from Laman Web: http://efiling.kehakiman.gov.my/eFiling/)

Ini susunan Afidavit Borang 6 (ikut susunan ni!!)

1. Afidavit Borang 6

2. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “A” – 

• lampirkan ‘Salinan Surat Beranak/birth cert’ belakang dia

3. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “B” – 

• lampirkan ‘Salinan IC’

4. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “C” – 

• lampirkan ‘salinan degree in BM’ & ‘salinan Certificate of Completion’* amek kat Bar Council (Dept. Admission)

5. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “D” – 

• lampirkan ‘ Borang 7 kelakuan baik yg disain oleh orang ada ijazah *x semestinya lawyer /org  gomen

6. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “E” – 

• lampirkan ‘Borang 7 jugak’ sbb 2 orang kene sain kan

7. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “F” – 

• lampirkan ‘Borang 8 Sijil Kerajinan sain by Master’  & ‘salinan cert. ethic course’ *kt bawah sain dia tu cop bc dia tu (yg ada tulis peguambela & peguamcara)

8. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “G” – 

• lampirkan ‘salinan BM exemption’

9. Sijil Perakuan Ekshibit “H” – 

• lampirkan ‘sijil penampalan’ yg telah di extract dr laman web e-filing

Pesanan Ringkas

• sila potong dengan pen dakwat hitam dekat Borang 6 (*7) yg tulis saya telah lulus peperiksaan BM (itu takde kene mengena). Sebab kite ada sijil pengecualian BM.
• sila tulis tarikh dekat borang 7 & 8 tu sama tarikh dengan filing walaupun master dengan 2 org yg sain sijil kelakuan baik tu sain lebih awal.
• jangan tulis date hape2 kt tempat lain selain 7 & 8

Seterusnya....

Bila dah siap ketiga-tiga dokumen ni (Afidavit 6, Notis Perbicaraan & Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen) boleh la pergi KL untuk buat payment dan filing
* ketiga-tiga dokumen ni jgn staple, pakai paper clip je* 

Dekat Kuala Lumpur (nyanyi lagu kole lumpor dulu)

1. Pergi Wisma Maran Tingkat 8 (Wisma Maran ni bawah dia ada Bank AMBANK – deret kedai Mamak kite breakfast tuh Bangunan paling tepi) – ko pergi Tingkat 8 tau pastu ckp kt kaunter tu sye nak bayar fee RM200. Nanti dia suh ko isi particular sket, bagi duit dia kuokan resit. Pastu berambus kuo sambil ucap terima kasih dengan senyuman manissssss.

2. Pergi Bar Council (ni kalau tak tau jugak tanye bangla2 kat situ) – sampai bar council pergi kt Payment table cakap saya nak bayar Instrument RM30 (nanti dia minx Resit yg ko bayar RM200 tadi ngan IC) dia suruh tunggu dlm 5 minit nak buat Instrumen.

3. Sambil tu pergi table Admission sebelah Payment je cakap saya nak collect Certificate of Completion (kalau mmg confirm dah lulus training programme). Dia bagi cert tu cek dl nama hape n sign acknowledgement. Instrumen pon siap.  Dia bagi resit instrument ng resit bayor rm200 tuh. Hamek semua. Pergi dengan ucap terima kasih.

4. okey kalo nak naik cab dari masjid jamek dlm RM8-9 pergi Court Duta (cab pakai meter)

5. Dah sampai Court Duta terus menuju ke café tingkat B1 sebab ko perlukan meja untuk cek dokumen semua dah lengkap tak n then ko perlu fotostat cert completion utk lampirkan belakang degree ko tu. Pastu fotostat sekali dua resit tu (kenapa kene fotostat nnti aku citer). Cek dulu susunan affidavit dah betul baru pergi level 1 untuk swearing.

6. Tak payah pergi RKKK dulu sebab sekarang depa tak cek pon Afidavit kejadah tuh..pandai2 kite la nak make sue bende tu betoi.

7. Pergi buat bayaran swearing kt kaunter pembayaran (sebelah kiri dr pintu masuk). Cakap ng akak jage nombor tu nak bayar utk Swearing. Swearing RM20.00 ye. Afidavit 1 dan Ekshibit 8 jadi total RM20. Bagi Afidavit tu kt akak kaunter tu. Bayor hamek resit n borang balik. 

8. Dah bayor pergi Kaunter Swearing. Cakap nak swearing & saya dah bayar. Bagi Afidavit ng Ekshibit tu kat dia (*make sure Borang 6 ko dah sain tau). Tunggu la dia cop dengan tenang.

9. Dah siap swearing pergi kaunter e-filing (sebelah kanan dr pintu masuk. Pergi Kaunter no 3 ckp sye nak filing affidavit 6/notis perbicaraan/sijil pengesahan (atau nak ringkas filing docs long call). Dia kasi satu borang e-filing n dia suh pergi bayor service charge RM10 dl. Isi borang pastu pergi bayor kat Kaunter Pembayaran td. Ckp kt akak jage nombor nak bayor service charge. Bayor n amek resit.

10. Pergi balik kaunter 3 e-filing tu, akak tu tulis2 sikit pastu dia bagi nombor giliran. Tunggu la sampai nombor ko dipanggil. Kalau tak ramai nasib le dlm 20 minit je tunggu. Sambil2 tu boleh prepare dokumen2 yang nak e-filing tu. (Afidavit, Notis Perbicaraan ng Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen – buang paper clip tuh)

11. Sampai giliran bagi dokumen2 tu kt kaunter untuk scan. 5 minit je scan tp tgu lama. Pastu dia suh tgu sebab nak kuakan invois pembayaran (aku gtau awal2 RM256). Tgu nombor same dipanggil amek invois kt kaunter 17 pergi bayor kt kaunter pembayaran td. Ni ckp ng akak jage nombor tu mahkamah tinggi. Nak bayor ni kene tgu lame sikit. Dah bayor amek resit terus pergi kaunter 18. Dia bagi resit boleh la siap sedia pi RKKK.

12. Sebelum pi RKKK tu kuakan instrument dengan sijil2 asal (surat beranak, degree, cert completion, cert etic course, BM exemption, sijil penampalan  dan salinan resit bayor rm200 ng rm30 tu untuk depa semak)

13. Kt kaunter RKKK ckp ngan akak tu sye dah buat e-filing affidavit 6 bla2.. dia tnye nak long call kat mane? Pastu dia bagi 2 salinan borang (Borang Transfer). Antara isi kandungan borang  tu nak long call kat mahkamah mane and kenapa? Bagi la sebab munasabah (kena state 3 reasons).

          - Latihan dalam kamar di Ipoh

          - keluarga di Ipoh

          - Master & Mover berada di Ipoh

14. Bagi balik borang2 tu dengan instrument dan sijil2 asal. Pastu depa suh ko tunggu dalam sejam gak la. Sebab nak minx PKP sain borang n seal instrument. Sambil tunggu tu pegi la makan2 kat café atau main candy crush ke.

15. Bila dah siap dia bagi 1 salinan borang transfer, instrument dan sijil2 asal tu. Make sure sume ade. Dah pergi balik.

16. Balik Ipoh/negeri masing-masing terus bawak borang transfer ngan instrument tu pergi court (tanye sape in charge utk long call) bagi dua benda tu kt dia. 

* if kat Ipoh masa kita serve dah boleh tanya date mana yang kosong untuk our long call day n berapa org yg akan long call sesamer, so dah bole tau date long call

17.Wait for the extraction date. 1-2 day dah dpt. Cek email nak tau sama ada Notis Perbicaraan & Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen dah boleh extract atau tidak.

18. Extract notis perbicaraan & sijil pengesahan dokumen kt e-filing dan print

19. Serve Afidavit Borang 6, Notis Perbicaraan & Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen kat:-

          - court (if  Ipoh xpayah serve sebab Ipoh ada system E-Filing)

          - perak/state bar

          -bar council

          -AG chamber

20. Prepare affidavit penyampaian borang 6,7 & 8 (sama mcm masa short call- serve to perak/state bar Sahaja)

*Bar Council normally xkan pulangkan cover letter pendua *yang acknowledgment tu* tapi dorang akan hantar surat rasmi yg state *we acknowledge receipts of your bla bla bla n we have no objection whatsoever bla bla bla*

21.  Sehari sebelum/ pagi before long call sila dtg awal untuk check dgn jurubahasa mahkamah segala document *takut kang ada yang xcomplete* sebab dia lagi arif apa yg judge selalu nak tengok * mcm dekat ipoh kena make sure ada sumer acknowledgement copy yang kita serve Borang 6, Notis Perbicaraan & Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen dekat Perak Bar, AG & Bar Council *prepare sekali acknowledgement copy kita serve affidavit of service pada State/ Perak Bar jugak)

p/s:

Dah dpt date jadi dah boleh cari mover *selalunya itu tugas Master yang carikan *make sure Mover not from ur firm ye 

Dah boleh siapkan kad jemputan if ada majlis makan2 yang korang buat + siapkan jugak speech untuk mover baca masa korang  punya long call nnt * setengah mover yg terlebih rajin dorang akan interview korang n dorang yg akan prepare speech siap bersajak2 bagai

Pengiraan Pembayaran (RM 566.00)

RM50 – penampalan

RM200 – disciplinary board

RM 30 – Instrumen

RM 20 – swearing affidavit

RM 10 – service charge

RM 200 – Notis Perbicaraan

RM 16 – Afidavit 6

RM 40 – Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen

p/s: Procedure Filing Borang 6, 7 & 8 yang saya share kat korang ni dibuat oleh kawan baik sy- Dekbo Ekin... sy tambah sikit2 jer... sy amat berterima kasih dekat dia kalau tak terkapai-kapai dlm kesesatan jugak la dekat High Court Duta... alhamdulillah berpandukan check list kat atas *sy siap tick dgn pen bila dah hbs setiap step* sy berjaya filing borang long call saya dengan suksessssss nya* mucho grasias sahabat

Hari Bersejarah (Long Call Day) - yang ni experience sendiri masa long call kat High Court Ipoh

*actually yang paling penting korang kena make sure yang Perak Bar, AG & Bar Council have no objection terhadap filing of korang punya petition

*mcm Perak Bar korang pegi la jumpa kerani kat saner tanya ada objection x... dorang pon akan tahu sama ada Bar Council ada objection ke tak (tapi selalunya mmg Bar Coucil akan inform sekali dalam surat yang dorang acknowledge receipt Borang 6, Notis Perbicaraan & Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen yang dorang have no objection terhadap filing of your petition)

*kalau AG lagi selamat korang call AG state & tanya sendiri pada person in charge untuk long call korang tu sama ada dorg ada objection atau tak *tapi pagi long call tu pon korang boleh confrimkan dgn jurubahasa sebab jurubahasa yang incharge tu baik n dia sendiri yang akan call AG tanya sama ada long call hari ini ada objection ke tidokk- gitue -datz y sangat penting korang dtg awal (pukul 8 sharp tu okay la)

1. Sehari sebelum long call silalah pergi ke High Court jumpa dgn pegawai yang uruskan pasal urusan long call korang.Lepas tu kalu ada masa terus la pegi jumapa jurubahasa Court tempat korang akan long call tu. Suruh dia check siap2 apa yang crucial kena ada esoknya.

2. So dari rumah make sure korang jgn lupa bawak Deraf Perintah* buat 2/3 salinan pon okay kalau nak selamat but actually kita pakai satu je, script untuk mover/latar belakang pempetisyen *in case mover tertinggal korang punya script tuh sebab korang sebenornya dah bagi kat mover beberapa hari sebelum korang punya long call, instrument of admission yang korang amik dekat Bar Council, file chambering korang yang simpan segala khazanah alam borang-borang *yang paling penting korang jgn lupa jugak korang bawak acknowlegedment copy yang sahkan korang dah serve pada AG, Bar Council & Perak Bar korang punya Borang 6,Notis Perbicaraan & Sijil Pengesahan Dokumen.

3. Masuk je court terus jumpa jurubahasa n ckp sy long call harini. Jurubahasa akan mintak n check apa dokumen yang ptt. Bila dah settle dia akan ckp korang yang ke berapa yang akan dipanggil *selalu kat ipoh long call akan ada dlm 5 orang

4. Lepas tu jumpa la mover n master (sembang la apa yang ptt) *siap2 la bagi robe korang kat Master untuk pegang *jgn lupa by that time korang dah pakai bit siap2 cuma robe je bagi kat Master untuk disarungkan kat korang nnt)

5. amik tempat duduk korang sementara tunggu kes start dipanggil *selalunya hakim akan panggil untuk dengar long call dulo before dia proceed dengar kes-kes lain haritu.

6. Bila judge masuk, mcm biasa la sumer kat dlm court kena bangun bow/tunduk hormat

7. Jurubahasa akan start panggil no. petition (so ingat yer no pettion korang, karang tersilap bangun malu le plak cuz dorang xkan panggil nama)

8. Pastu jalan dgn penuh confidentnye ke tempat yg korang sepatutnya berdiri sementara menunggu mover bacakan latar belakang korang -kalau sape yg xtahan sebak ouhhh 

*masa ni master yang complete ber'robe dah standby duduk belakang tempat korang berdiri untuk sarungkan jubah korang nnt

9. ayat last sekali yg berdebor2 tue bila mover akan cakap *Mohon supaya petisyen penerimaan masuk peguambela & peguamcara dibenarkan seperti yang dipohon- lebih kurang la ayat nye mcm mintak perintah seperti dipohon dekat judge

10. Lepas tu wakil dari Perak Bar & AG akan bangun & ckp tiada bantahan

11. Judge plak akan ckp bagi pihak Jabatan Kehakiman tiada bantahan & Perintah Seperti Dipohon!!!! huh, lega bila dengar wehh

12. Master akan sarungkan robe pada korang.

13. Sila lah bow pada judge sebelum berjalan balik ke tempat duduk korang pastu dudk balik sampai la kes haritu selesai

14. Diingatkan mcm kat Ipoh judge akan panggil korang masuk chamber lepas settle long call , so pastikan korang dah dapatkan tandatangan mover, wakil AG n wakil state bar siap2 sebelum dorang balik kalau tak terpaksa la korang buat kerja dua kali- kena chase plak dorang sampai kat ofis/ AG state bagai *dorang akan betulkan nama dorang if korang silap letak atau salah spelling nama dorang, so jgn risau bagi je dorang betulkan n isi sendiri nama dorang

15. Dah siap terus bagi deraf perintah tu dekat jurubahasa untuk kelulusan *xperlu filing

14. kat Ipoh, judge akan panggil masuk chamber dorang untuk bagi kata-kata nasihat, madah pujangga bagai, tangkap gambo n lastly dorang akan sign directly instrument of admission depan korang n dated kan benda alah tu pastu serahkan by hand sorang-sorang *masa ni korang dibenarkan tangkap gambo dengan judge sama ada secara individu atau grouping

15. dah hbs jumpa judge then kluar le buat hal masing-masing. SEKIAN....

p/s: Maaf diatas penggunaan bahasa pasar..hehe.. :) harap bermanfaat! 

Taraa! After being officially admitted as an Advocate & Solicitor 

Muka lapar!! tengah tunggu kat lobi hotel b4 makan2 start

Arrest:

Q: Critically analyse the Privy Council’s decision in Shaaban and the Federal Court’s decision in Jayaraman vis-à-vis Section 15 of the CPC.

In your view, do you think that the decision in the two cases can be reconciled with the provision in CPC.

______________________________________________________

Sumber gambar: Google

Arrest is one of initial steps involved in the criminal process leading to the possible prosecution of an individual. According to Lord Simonds in Christie v Leachinsky, arrest is the beginning of imprisonment. There are many aspects such as how an arrest may be lawfully affected, in what circumstances the arrest may be constituted and the rights attach to it. Procedure of Arrest need to be carefully observed as it involved fundamental rights of the personal liberty of a person as expressly stated in Article 5 of the Federal Constitution, of which there can be no deprivation save in accordance with the law.

            Generally, definition of arrest according to Halsbury’s Law of England is that arrest consists in the seizure or touching of a person’s body with a view to his restraint and words may amount to an arrest if in the circumstances of the case they are calculated to bring and do bring to a person’s notice that he is under compulsion and he thereafter submits to the compulsion. In Ratanlal, it was stated that when used in the legal sense in the procedure connected with criminal offences, an arrest consists of taking into custody of another person under authority empowered by law for the purpose of holding or detaining him to answer a criminal charge and preventing the commission of a criminal offence. 

            Malaysia has its own provision and law regarding an arrest and how should it be made as stated in Section 15 Criminal Procedure Code. Section 15(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code sets out three statutory modes by which an arrest may be affected by a police officer or other person, namely, firstly, by actually touching the body of the person to be arrested, secondly, by actually confining the body of the person to be arrested or thirdly, where there is a submission to the custody, by word or action on the part of the person to be arrested. 

As far as we are concerned, based on the provision of Section 15(1) it would means that when a person is arrested he shall actually be touched or his body confined by the arrestor unless in which he submits to the custody whether by word or conduct. Hence, mere words by the arrestor are insufficient unless accompanied by submission on the part of the suspect itself. Issue will definitely arose whether there is submission and this question of fact may be evidenced and proved by words or conduct in each particular case.

As far as the matter having been codified as stated above, one would have thought that the courts should confine its examination and mode of arrested to the wording of Section 15(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code in order to determine whether there has been an arrest or not in a given case. However, based on the analysis our courts seemed to also apply the various propositions laid down by the Lord Devlin in the Privy Council case of Shaaban & Anor v Chong Fook Kam & Anor.

The Privy Council in the Malaysian appeal case of Shaaban & Anor v Chong Fook Kam & Anor had the occasion to consider what elements constitute a valid arrest. Facts of this case were that a piece of wood fell from a timber lorry hitting a car and killing one of the two men in it. The lorry did not stop. The two respondents were arrested at 7.00 am on 11 July 1965 and detained on suspicion that one of them had driven the lorry in a rash and negligent manner resulting in a piece of wood falling and killing one of the men in the car. Later in the day, their explanations of alibi were found to be false and they were further detained. In the Shaaban’s case, Lord Devlin delivering the judgment of the Privy Council held, inter alia, that an arrest could occurs in three manner in which firstly, when a Police Officer states in terms he is arresting, secondly, when he uses force to restrain an individual concerned or thirdly, when by words or conduct he makes it clear that he will, if necessary, use force to prevent the individual from going where he may want to go. It does not occur where he stops an individual to make enquiries.

As what we can see is that Lord Devlin’s definition is wider in scope than what expressly stated in Section 15(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Lord Devlin’s propositions cover situations where actual touching or confinement may not take place. In this kind of situations, words or actions to the effect that force will be used on the suspect to prevent him from escaping would suffice.

After analyzing the statutory modes as provided in Section 15(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code with the case law propositions propounded by Lord Devlin will show that there exist material differences which may give rise to different conclusions. In order to illustrate this kind of differences, it is vital important to consider a hypothetical situation in a given situations. 

For instance, a policeman was shouting at a snatch thief who was trying to run away “This is police, stop! You are under arrest”. In this situation, the snatch thief was some distance away did not submit to the arrest but continued to run away. Definitely, when we applying the test laid down in Section 15(1) of the CPC it is clear that no arrest has taken place as the facts cannot fall under any of the modes set out in Section 15 CPC. However, if one were to apply the test laid down by Lord Devlin, different conclusions is reached as the said situation would come within the propositions number one. Here, it can concluded that the propositions one as laid down by Lord Devlin may have been too widely stated and thus it is not totally reconcilable with the provisions of Section 15(1) of the CPC as far as we can see in the above situation there is clearly no actual touching or confinement or submission to custody by the suspect. 

In second situation, for example, Inspector E hears screams for help and witnesses the suspect running off with the handbag. He brandishes his service revolver and points in the direction of suspect and shouts “Stop, or I’ll shoot!” The suspect when noticing the large crowd between him and the said officer and does not think that the said officer would not dare to actually carry out his threat so he continues running to get away. In this situation, applying the test set out under Section 15(1) of the CPC, there is obviously no arrest but if one were to apply Lord Devlin’s propositions then an arrest having taken place as stated under propositions three which stated that an arrest occurs when by words or conduct he makes it clear that he will, if necessary, use force to prevent the individual from going where he may want to go. Based on the above situation, it may be said that those propositions appear to have been too widely or loosely stated and seemed to go beyond the contemplation of Section 15(1) of the CPC.

In addition, Lord’s Devlin definition was refereed to and approved by the Federal Court’s case of Jayaraman & Ors v Public Prosecutor. In this case Suffian LP proceeded to apply Lord Devlin’s judgement from Shaaban’s case and apply the said propositions to the facts of the case.  In applying those propositions, the Federal Court concluded that there was no arrest and based on the facts of the case it cpuld not be said that the applicants had been arrested by the corporal when he told them to wait and not to leave the temple as he had merely stopped them to make inquiries into the attack on the temple. However, the result could turn the other way round if the court examined Section 15(1) of the CPC carefully. In Jayaraman’s case, there had earlier been a series of attacks on Hindu temples involving the desecration of certain idols. Two Indians came to the Police Station to make a report at 3.05 am at Kerling an reported that five men had attacked the temple and thus there was a fight between them and the temple guards and that the attackers had been surrounded. Corporal Abdul Ghani went to the temple with the Indians and there he saw the eight applicants and the priest of the temple. He told them not to leave the temple. A.S.P Jamaluddin arrived at the temple at 3.35 am and questioned orally the applicant. It was admissibility of their replies that was in issue in this case. The defence had argued that since the suspects had been earlier arrested and there being no caution administered to them before they were questioned, their replies were inadmissible under Section 113 of the CPC. But as far as we are concerned, this requirement need only be fulfilled if there was an arrest in the very first place and that was how the matter of whether there was an arrest comes to be an issue.

In the Jayaraman’s case, the Federal Court took the simplistic approach of posing and applying the three propositions laid down by Lord Devlin rather took into consideration on Section 15(1) f the code. If the court considered Section 15(1) more carefully, it might be concluded that there were in fact an arrest as bearing in mind the background of some four killings and the fact that the eight persons appeared to have submitted to custody by their own conduct of staying at the temple until the arrival of ASP Jamaluddin when they are being told not the leave the temple by Corporal Abdul Ghani.

The development of our case law after Jayaraman’s case shows that some judges tried to distinguish between actual arrest and constructive arrest. In contrast, in PP v Kang Ho Soh, the court did not find the distinction helpful. The issue whether in a particular case a person was under arrest at a given moment of time is a question of fact to be decided according to the circumstances of each case.

In a conclusion, it will be quite differences if Lord Devlin’s proposition is used despite the Section 15(1) of the cpc. As far as we concerned, it is unfortunate that Lord Devlin did not advert nor referred to the provisions of Section 15(1) of the Code when propounding the law of arrest although Shaaban’s case was an appeal from Malaysia. In addition, it can be concluded that the Privy Council in Shaaban’s case had actually applied the English concept as to what constituted a valid arrest when it applying the three situations eventhough it did not refer to our own provision in Section 15(1) of the Code. As we compared these Lord Devlin’s and Section 15(1) of the code it will show that there are some inconsistencies with regard to what constitutes a valid arrest. On the part of Malaysian legislative there have to decide either want to apply widely interpreted scope of arrest as stated by Lord Devlin or tend to follow our Section 15(1). There are certain elements in Lord Devlin’s propositions that can be reconciled into our CPC in order to make the law on arrest become more reliable in terms of its application in each of particular case.

p/s: this is my assignment question... just to share the information & also the outcome :)